The Liberals like to tell us that Sunday's vote on health care "reform" was historic. They are right.
Never before has the U.S. Congress voted on a bill so massive, so intrusive, that affects every person in the United States, all the while showing absolute contempt for the will of the American people and a total disdain for the voices of opposition.
Never before has Congress been so blatantly corrupt, so nakedly unashamed (and even proud!) of the backroom deals, bribery, threats, and extortion that were all required to get this bill passed by the slimmest of margins.
It was an historic event.
Hurricane Katrina was historic, too. As was 9/11, Pearl Harbor, Nixon's resignation, Clinton's impeachment, and the Mura building bombing.
Historic does not necessarily mean good for America.
With the health care "reform" bill, we saw an historic abdication of responsibility, an historic display of hubris and political self-gratification, an historic corruption of the American political process, and an historic shift in the government/populace relationship that might be forever damaged.
John Boehner was right, Democrats; you should be ashamed of yourselves.
I know I am ashamed of you.
Showing posts with label reform. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reform. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Will Obama Actually Pass Health Care Reform as an Earmark on a TARP Bill??
According to the Heritage Foundation, Obama and the Democrats plan to pass the health care overhaul as an "earmark" on an un-related piece of legislation: "... the entire health care reform effort will be included as an amendment to a ...TARP bill (on limiting executive pay) that has been collecting dust in the Senate for months."
I know what you are thinking: But haven't republicans ever done the same thing?
Certainly, it is a common trick on Capitol Hill to slip items into other legislation to ensure passage. It is a slimy trick that I thought Obama was going to rise above.
The outrage here is that the health care "reform" affects every single person in the United States.
I should think that something that will touch the lives in as basic and personal way as health care and health coverage would not be shuffled under the rug and slipped through without an actual vote on the issue.
Especially when every poll shows 60-70% of Americans are opposed to the plan they are trying to sneak through.
So much for change in Washington; so much for openness and transparency; so much for medical care in the U.S. if this thing actually passes.
I know what you are thinking: But haven't republicans ever done the same thing?
Certainly, it is a common trick on Capitol Hill to slip items into other legislation to ensure passage. It is a slimy trick that I thought Obama was going to rise above.
The outrage here is that the health care "reform" affects every single person in the United States.
I should think that something that will touch the lives in as basic and personal way as health care and health coverage would not be shuffled under the rug and slipped through without an actual vote on the issue.
Especially when every poll shows 60-70% of Americans are opposed to the plan they are trying to sneak through.
So much for change in Washington; so much for openness and transparency; so much for medical care in the U.S. if this thing actually passes.
Labels:
care,
harry reid,
health,
heritage foundation,
Obama,
reform,
TARP
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Boston Globe: At Least Obama's Health Care is Better than North Korea
The Boston Globe's Metro newspaper, a freebie hand-out tabloid hawked on subway platforms, gives feint praise to President Obama and his health care "reform" plans:
Under one of the more ludicrous headlines of all time, the paper compares the United States favorably to such "Socialist" countries as Cuba, China, Vietnam, and North Korea.
If the best thing you can say about Obama's health care plan is that it is better than North Korea's health care, you had better revisit your talking points.
Health care is far from the only issue driving critics to chide Obama for wanting to turn America into a socialist nation. Since the beginning of the 2008 election, Republicans have been warning that Obama plans to institute über-liberal policies. Here’s a look at the policies of some of the world’s countries most rooted in socialism. The United States is a far cry from them.In short: We'll, it ain't Cuba!
Under one of the more ludicrous headlines of all time, the paper compares the United States favorably to such "Socialist" countries as Cuba, China, Vietnam, and North Korea.China: The Government oversees private business entities, mandating that they conform to the state's economic interests.Setting aside that these countries are avowed Communist regimes, I am grateful that the Obama administration doesn't control any private entities in this country, or want to meddle in their business affairs or affect the course of any business in the U.S.
If the best thing you can say about Obama's health care plan is that it is better than North Korea's health care, you had better revisit your talking points.
You think Obama's policies are liberal? America, you haven’t even begun to taste true liberalism...Perhaps that is true; but we don't want a taste of "true liberalism" (aka Communism). It tastes bitter going down and leaves a real sour aftertaste, from what I hear.
Labels:
communism,
Cuba,
health,
health care,
Metro,
north korea,
President Obama,
reform,
socilaism
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)